Lauric Acid: The history of an apparently essential
saturated fat.
What Is the Current Use of Lauric-rich Diets as Antiviral
Modalities for Adjunct Nutrition Support in HIV?
Except for the use of commercially available enteral feeding
supplements (e.g., Ensure-type liquids) that utilize medium-chain
triglyceride (MCT) oils, and one enteral product (Impact®,
Sandoz Nutrition) that contains palm kernel oil as part of its
structured lipid, novel or unusual dietary treatments related
to fats in the diet appear not to have been systematically investigated
for HIV adjunct treatment, although there is a substantial research
supporting their potential. At least one of the commercial lipid
formulas (High MCT Supplement®, Corpak, Inc.) is based on
coconut oil. This product is listed as an incomplete medical
food in tables of enteral formulas and does not appear to have
been utilized in treatment of AIDS patients.
The American Foundation for AIDS Research (AMFAR) did a preliminary
review of the antiviral lipid monolaurin in 1987 but did not
pursue this adjunct treatment modality (AMFAR office, personal
communication 1994). Also in 1987, an alternative medical journal
published an extensive discussion of the properties and clinical
use of monolaurin. However, as noted above, the review by Raiten(6)
did not indicate use of or knowledge of monolaurin.
Most dietary recommendations published for HIV+/AIDS patients
are directed at prevention of weight loss. All the diets currently
being formally recommended by the professional dietetic groups,
government agencies, or organizations involved in support for
individuals with AIDS are structured from foods that are missing
lauric acid. Thus any benefit that might accrue to an individual
who is HIV+ or has AIDS, from the substantial utilization of
lauric acid-rich foods, is missing.
The potential benefits that can be derived from feeding antimicrobial
lipids need to be investigated in humans on a systematic basis,
the lauric oils need to be made more readily available in the
general food supply, and the rationale for use of these lipids
needs to be explained to the food and nutrition professionals
as well as the medical and lay community.
Loss of lauric acid from the American diet
Increasingly, over the past 40 years, the American diet has
undergone major changes. Many of these changes involve changes
of fats and oils. There has been an increasing supply of the
partially hydrogenated trans-containing vegetable oils and a
decreasing amount of the lauric acid-containing fats and oils.
As a result of these shifts in fats usage, there has been an
increased consumption of trans fatty acids and linoleic acid
and a decrease in the consumption of lauric acid. There has
also been a decrease in some of the other antimicrobial fatty
acids. This type of change in the diet has an important effect
on the fatty acids the body has available for its metabolic
activities.
The lipid coated (envelop) viruses are dependent on host lipids
for their lipid constituents. Given this fact, it becomes important
to evaluate the variability of the fatty acids in an individual
patient’s diet, since such variability is reflected in
the changes in the lipid membrane of the virus envelop, leads
to the variability of glycoprotein expression, and plays a role
in the aspects of mutation that interfere with successful vaccine
development.
Lauric Acid Intake in Selected Asian Countries
Based on the per capita intake of coconut oil in 1985 as reported
by Kaunitz, the per capita daily intake of lauric acid can be
approximated. For those major producing countries such as the
Philippines, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka, and consuming countries
such as Singapore, the daily intakes of lauric acid were approximately
7.3 grams (Philippines), 4.9 grams (Sri Lanka), 4.7 grams (Indonesia),
and 2.8 grams (Singapore). In India, intake of lauric acid from
coconut oil in the coconut growing areas (e.g., Kerala) range
from about 12 to 20 grams per day , whereas the average for
the rest of the country is less than half a gram. An average
high of approximately 68 grams of lauric acid is calculated
from the coconut oil intake previously reported by Prior et
al in 1981 for the Tokelau Islands. Other coconut producing
countries may also have intakes of lauric acid in the same range.
Lauric Acid Intake in the U.S.
In the United States today, there is very little lauric acid
in most of the foods. During the early part of the 20th Century
and up until the late 1950s many people consumed heavy cream
and high fat milk. These foods could have provided approximately
3 grams of lauric acid per day to many individuals. In addition,
desiccated coconut was a popular food in homemade cakes, pies
and cookies, as well as in commercial baked goods, and 1-2 tablespoons
of desiccated coconut would have supplied 1-2 grams of lauric
acid. Those foods made with the coconut oil based shortenings
would have provided additional amounts. Until two years ago,
some of the commercially sold popcorn, at least in movie theaters,
had coconut oil as the oil. This means that for those people
lucky enough to consume this type of popcorn the possible lauric
acid intake was 6 grams or more in a three(3) cup order.
Some infant formulas (but not all) have been good sources of
lauric acid for infants. However, in the past 3-4 years there
has been reformulation with a loss of a portion of coconut oil
in these formulas, and a subsequent lowering of the lauric acid
levels. Only one U.S. manufactured enteral formula contains
lauric acid (e.g., Impact®); this is normally used in hospitals
for enteral tube feeding; it is reported to be very effective
in reversing severe weight loss in AIDS patients , but it is
discontinued when the patients leave the hospital because it
is not sufficiently palatable for continued oral use (D.P. Kotler,
private communication, 1995) The more widely promoted enteral
formulas (e.g., Ensure®, Nutren®) are not made with
lauric oils, and, in fact, many are made with partially hydrogenated
oils.
There are currently some candies sold in the US that are made
with palm kernel oil, and a few specialty candies made with
coconut oil and desiccated coconut. These can supply small amounts
of lauric acid. Cookies such as macaroons, if made with desiccated
coconut, are good sources of lauric acid, supplying as much
as 6 grams of lauric acid per macaroon (Red Mill Farm's Jennies
Macaroons is apparently the only brand in the U.S. that supplies
this amount). However, these cookies make up a small portion
of the cookie market. Most cookies in the United States are
no longer made with coconut oil shortenings; however, there
was a time when many U.S. cookies (e.g., Pepperidge Farm) were
about 25% lauric acid.
Originally, one of the largest manufacturers of cream soups
used coconut oil in the soup formulations. Many popular cracker
manufacturers also used coconut oil as a spray coating. These
products supplied a small amount of lauric acid on a daily basis
for some people.
Probable Levels of Lauric Acid Required For Antimicrobial Effect
Based on the amount of lauric acid found in human milk, which
is known to be effective in its role as an antimicrobial component
for the infant, the percent of calories that would be appropriate
can be determined. For example, human milk provides at least
3.5% of calories as lauric acid for the human infant. Mature
human milk has been noted to have up to 12% of the total fat
as lauric acid (approximately 6.6% of calories. The upper end
of this range represents approximately twice the amount of calories
as lauric acid (i.e., 7% of calories) as does the minimum.
When developing lauric-rich diets for adults, one can use this
range as the starting point for calculating the amount of lauric
fat to be consumed. Based on the upper end of the range, we
see that this would entail providing an adult consuming 3000
kilocalories a day with 52 grams of coconut oil (approximately
24 grams of lauric acid). This could be accomplished by use,
for example, of two 250 ml cans of a calorically dense enteral
formula (e.g., Carnation Nutren 2.0) if that product was made
with full coconut oil. As it is, that product is made with MCT
oil and corn oil and provides no lauric acid.
Lauric acid-rich diets can be developed readily for infants
and children. For infants, a formula made with coconut oil that
supplies at least 7% of the calories as lauric acid would be
needed. When infants progress to solid food, these foods can
be enriched with added coconut oil. Cereals and strained baby
foods make ideal bases for 2-5 gram additions coconut oil (0.5-1.0
teaspoons). This would add approximately 1-2 grams of lauric
acid. Children can utilize the same protocol as outlined for
adults with alterations in the portions of food depending on
the caloric needs of the child.